Nick Osmaston, an independent energy management consultant (nick.osmaston@btinternet.com)
sent us this comment on the above:
The author mentions both leakage and unnecessary use as opportunities for saving energy. In principle this is of course correct, but in many cases the output of air from the compressors is not proportional to the electricity input. In other words, the generation efficiency is both low and variable. If the effect of reducing leakage or consumption is to lower generation efficiency, then the potential savings will not be realised. To give an example, I recently surveyed an industrial site with a number of compressors each rated at about 75-kW. I determined by inspection that one was running unnecessarily, and by energy analyser that it was drawing 73-kW. When the compressor was pneumatically isolated the load dropped.....by just 5-kW! This is not an isolated incident - on virtually every multiple compressor installation I look at there are control deficiencies that mean that simple leakage reduction measures will not produce pro-rata, or indeed any savings in energy consumption. Even quite fancy centralised control systems do not always produce a perfect result - I have also seen variable speed compressors running as the "lead" machine (at full output) with a fixed speed unit on and off-loading to top up the system. Compressors' off-load mechansms are ofen defective, and compressors run off load for long periods of time unnecessarily. The quickest and easiest way of saving money on your compressors may be to improve the control, and the best way to find out is to monitor their individual electricity demand for at least a week using energy analysers. This may sound demanding, but the potential rewards are huge, and at the end of the day you pay for what goes into a compressor, not what comes out of it.